The universal truth
What? Are we going back in time to 2001. No, not at
all. Until 2011, I thought, like so many others, that the WTC attacks of 11th September
2001 happened exactly as we were told by the mainstream media:
Four passenger aircrafts were hijacked that morning by
19 men of Arab origin. Two of the planes were steered right into the two World
Trade Center towers. A third plane was slammed into the Pentagon while the
fourth crashed in a field, the hijackers having been attacked and overwhelmed
by the passengers. About an hour after the first WTC tower was hit, it
collapsed in a pile of rubble. A while later the second tower did the same. We
were told that weakening of the construction from both the crash and the following
fires made the collapse inevitable. Almost 3.000 people died on that day.
But in 2011 that image changed
for me – forever. The reason being is as follows…..
The alternative, and most likely truth
Having recently discovered that media
coverage of the Fukushima disaster did not give a true picture of the events there,
I decided to investigate the 911 events in the same way I had approached the Fukushima disaster; i.e. turn to
alternative media sources. Among the first things I became aware of was that
there were not only two, but three skyscrapers that collapsed that day. I vaguely
remembered having noticed this on the news that day.
Though, at that time I had not attach any importance to it. Now it struck me: Two airplanes – three collapses. How could
that be?
The equation didn’t add up any longer. Via
searches on the internet I found a lecturer, Richard Gage, who explained why it
is physically impossible that the collapse could have been caused by the fires
that occurred in WTC 1, 2 and 7. Physically impossible! The temperature in the
burning building never reached the levels required to melt the steel. Not by a
long shot. It was lacking by approximately one thousand degrees Fahrenheit. And
even if you allow yourself to be persuaded that the bearing capacity of the
construction was weakened by plane impact and heat, it is simply impossible for the buildings to
collapse the way they did – namely at speeds very close to freefall (which for
WTC7 authorities like NIST nowadays also admit). This indicates no resistance
at all. All steel must have been gone- melted. How was this possible? The only possible
explanation for this is that the load-bearing elements had been removed through
controlled demolition. The evidence speaks for itself. All three buildings were
blown up in a very well planned and executed controlled demolition. This, we
become aware of from
·
Convincing video footage, lectures and documentaries (available in
quantity from, among other sites - YouTube)
· the residue of explosives found around the buildings afterwards.
I have collected a few links to
documentary material which explains why the official account of events is to be
regarded as a myth. The material is very convincing and therefore also very
scary.
The first video (below) will take you through
a lecture by the just mentioned Richard Gage. Richard operates since 2006 a
network called "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth". As the name
suggests, it consists of professional, dedicated building architects and
engineers who are convinced that the official version of what happened is not
correct. It is a lie. The lecture is pedagogical and filled with facts. It is
long (about 2 hours). But it is well worth your time.
Should you regard the first video
insurmountable, there is a shorter variant; a 6-minute synopsis of why the
official version of the truth simply cannot be true (second video).
